Flooding social media timelines, the mostly negative comments on the first episode of “new” Top Gear screened on 1 June obviously have begged direct comparison to the old crew’s styles, patter, similar themed inserts and even highlightd the casual jokey delivery of studio links.
It has little to do with the actual quality of the new team to be fair, and was inevitable given the way in which the entire character of the show was so closely aligned to the individual personalities of the dear-departed.
Its a bitter lesson in brand building, watching such an iconic, popular and influential programme being dramatically dissed on most platforms.
We wouldn’t be surprised to see the programme disappear all together after its inaugural “new” season this year and hope the BCC do what they should have done to begin with – gather their collective talents together to create something, new and entirely devoid of references to the past programme.
A great pity, and a poorly handled rebirth of a brand that should have been re-invented not ressurected.
Original Blog Below…
So unless you have been living in the boot of a reasonably priced car, you will pretty much know that the writing is on the test track tyre-wall for the once mighty BBC motoring institution Top Gear.
The edgy, and charismatic Jeremy Clarkson seems to have allowed his legendary ego to get the better of him once too often. and in an altercation around the provision of a hot meal, punched a producer for not doing his job. (The producer WAS Irish, but I’m not sure that alone is reason enough to swing a right hook?)
From the outside, objectively, the BBC are pretty much “damned-if-you-do”, “damned-if-you-dont” in the scenario planning of the future of their biggest selling franchise. At best they have publicly aired their dirty laundry surrounding the real personality of their affable, blokey, everyman presenter who is actually, if reports are to be believed, an ego-manical, celebrity-fuelled tosser. At worst, should they axe the iconic Clarkson, they will no-doubt pretty much succeeded in toppling a mighty franchise and global cash-cow.
Now before we go over-dramatically claiming that this is unexpected and terribly sudden, you have to assume they would have learnt from the STIG-saga! Various drivers behind the Stig helmet over the last years have rippled the code of the Top-Gear matrix by threatening to, and then disclosing their true identity, no doubt to cash in on the fame and fortune of being associated with the worlds most watch TV series.
Yet they have undeniably, even with Jezza’s previous poor conduct around racial slurs, increasingly edgy opinions and a growing super-ego behind the scenes (apparently), continued to allow Clarkson to dominate programming content, appearances and live events. There has not been even the slightest editorial shift that I have been able to pick up, despite Clarkson obviously being an increasingly loose cannon.
In case we are in any doubt of the inextricable integration of Brand Clarkson, and Brand Top Gear – Norway has already announced a “postponement” of Top Gear Live! Let’s not forget Top Gear is a large franchise, not just limited to TV Programming. The financial viability of the Top Gear Live event’s in Hong Kong, Sydney and of course Jozi, without Clarkson as a drawcard, has to be a looming question on promotors balance sheets right now. It is noticeable the beleaguered South African event has been noticably quiet on the subject, clearing dispelling the old adage that any publicity is good publicity!
Marketing 101: Brands associate with individual celebrities at their peril! End of Story! Finish and Klaar! Global icons such as Tiger Woods and Oscar Pistorius have proven this concept over and over again and in this case Clarkson may well be too closely aligned to Top Gear for it to survive without him.
It is an interesting dilemma. The direct relationship between brands and celebrities creating emotional connections between Fans and Brands, will always be hamstrung by the exact reason that brands do this to begin with. These celebrities are real people. Warts and All! And the great emotional connection these ambassadors bring to the mix of Brand-Love, can just as quickly create massive and irreparable fall-out as a result.
Where it’s really pertinent right now, is simple! Clarkson is not just a brand Ambassador of the Top Gear Franchise. Jeremy Clarkson IS Top Gear!
Anyone having watched the editorial sound but sadly lacking Australian or North American versions (cancelled last year) will surely attest to the inextricable value, and character that Clarkson brings to the Top Gear recipe.
The producers killed off Black Stig by driving him off an aircraft carrier, when he publicly outed himself his identity was revealed by the press after a motoring incident (correction by the real Black Stig, Perry McCarthy @original_stig) and I sort of feel the swan song of Clarkson’s imminent public firing needs to be as bold! No re-casting, re-jigging, re-scripting or re-alligning to a new presenter, no matter how famous, is going to bring the “old” Top-Gear back,
in fact in may well make better business sense to kill it off, like Black Stig, leaving audience and show exiting on a high (except for the Falklands episodes) rather than attempt to re-cast and re-create the unique dynamic of character and content that made the original so successful.
RIP Top Gear. It’s been a great ride! If Clarkson is not returning to the studios, it really is time to hang up the keys, and switch off the lights, before more damage is done to an iconic brand.